Best Alternatives to Glide in 2025
While Glide excels at turning spreadsheets into simple apps, you might need alternatives for more complex logic, different data sources, or greater design control. Exploring other platforms can offer better scalability, native mobile features, or a more traditional development environment.
AppSheet
No‑code development platform for business apps
As another Google Cloud platform, it's a direct competitor that also builds apps from data sources like Sheets, but with stronger enterprise features, AI-powered automation, and deeper integration into the Google ecosystem.
Bubble
Build web apps without code
This is a powerful alternative for building complex web applications with custom logic and workflows from scratch, offering far greater design freedom and backend control, though with a steeper learning curve than Glide.
Thunkable
Create native mobile apps without coding
A great choice if your priority is highly customizable, native-feeling mobile app design with a drag-and-drop interface, but it uses its own database instead of directly linking to a spreadsheet like Glide.
Adalo
Build apps without code
This platform is ideal for creating truly native iOS and Android apps with a block-based, visual programming approach, making it a strong alternative for projects requiring device hardware access or a store-ready app.
Glide Pages
Build powerful web apps from your data
An excellent Glide alternative for building client portals, internal tools, and websites directly from Airtable or Google Sheets, with a strong focus on access controls, membership sites, and beautiful templates.
Google App Maker
Build internal tools fast
This is the top alternative for developers and technical teams needing to rapidly build powerful internal tools, dashboards, and admin panels with SQL databases, APIs, and pre-built UI components.
The best alternative depends on your specific needs: choose AppSheet for Google-centric automation, Bubble for complex web apps, or Adalo/Thunkable for design-focused native apps. Evaluate based on your data source, required features, and technical comfort.